Socio-Affective Agents as Models of Human Behaviour in the Networked Prisoner's Dilemma

Affect Control Theory (ACT) is a powerful and general sociological model of human affective interaction. ACT provides an empirically derived mathematical model of culturally shared sentiments as heuristic guides for human decision making. BayesACT, a variant on classical ACT, combines affective reasoning with cognitive (denotative or logical) reasoning as is traditionally found in AI. BayesACT allows for the creation of agents that are both emotionally guided and goal-directed. In this work, we simulate BayesACT agents in the Iterated Networked Prisoner’s Dilemma (INPD), and we show four out of five known properties of human play in INPD are replicated by these socio-affective agents. In particular, we show how the observed human behaviours of network structure invariance, anti-correlation of cooperation and reward, and player type stratification are all clearly emergent properties of the networked BayesACT agents. We further show that decision hyteresis (Moody Conditional Cooperation) is replicated by BayesACT agents in over 2/3 of the cases we have considered. In contrast, previously used imitation-based agents are only able to replicate one of the five properties. We discuss the implications of these findings in the development of human-agent societies.